Trials / Enrolling By Invitation
Enrolling By InvitationNCT06972797
Accuracy of 3D Slicer Software for Automatic Segmentation Versus Manual Segmentation Using Commercial Software to Evaluate Impacted and Unerupted Maxillary Canine: An Observational Study
Accuracy of the DentalSegmentator Tool in 3D Slicer Software Compared to Manual Segmentation in Romixes Software in the Evaluation of Unerupted and Impacted Maxillary Canine: An Observational Study
- Status
- Enrolling By Invitation
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 21 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 8 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Our research question will be, can automatic segmentation of maxillary impacted and unerupted canine using DentalSegmentator tool in 3D silcer software be as accurate as manual segmentation?
Conditions
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-09-30
- Completion
- 2026-10-31
- First posted
- 2025-05-15
- Last updated
- 2025-05-15
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06972797. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.