Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06954714
Late-lumen Changes After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Lesions
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 256 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Chonnam National University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study aims to compare late-lumen loss (LLL) between DCB and DES to treat de novo coronary artery stenosis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Detailed description
Drug-eluting stent (DES) is the standard of care for patients with coronary artery disease who are eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1 During long-term follow-up, remained metallic stent strut continuously related with stent-related cardiovascular events.2 As an alternative option to DES, drug-coated balloon (DCB) which has benefit of having shorter DAPT maintenance duration due to the absence of metallic scaffolds and polymers, has been introduced. Based on meta-analysis based on many randomized clinical trials (RCT),3,4 its use has been established in in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents and DES.5 Furthermore, recent RCTs demonstrated efficacy and safety of DCB in de novo coronary lesions in small vessels with reference vessel size \<3.0mm.6,7 For the patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery lesions, REC-CAGEFREE I tested the non-inferiority of DCB angioplasty with DES implantation, irrespective of vessel diameter.8 Overall, 2272 patients were randomly assigned to the DCB or the DES group. At 2 years, adverse events occurred in 6.4% of DCB group and 3.4% of DES group and failed to prove the non-inferiority of DCB angioplasty (P for non-inferiority=0.65). Regarding the heterogenous results, it is questionable that DCB angioplasty for large de novo lesions is safe and effective compared with DES implantation. On this background, the current study aims to compare late-lumen loss (LLL) between DCB and DES to treat de novo coronary artery stenosis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Drug-eluting stent implantation | IVUS (OPTICROSS, Boston Scientific, USA) will be recommended to select proper size of predilatation balloon (semi- or non-compliant balloon), DCB, or DES. Optimal lesion preparation is defined as satisfying all of the followings: 1) a fully inflated balloon of the correct size for the vessel (balloon with vessel ratio \>0.90); 2) ≤35% residual stenosis; 3) TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 3; and 4) the absence of a flow-limiting coronary artery dissection.15 After successful lesion preparation, patients will receive either DCB or DES according to randomly allocated groups. In DES group, latest second-generation DES will be used in accordance with standard practice guideline. |
| PROCEDURE | Drug-coated balloon angioplasty | IVUS (OPTICROSS, Boston Scientific, USA) will be recommended to select proper size of predilatation balloon (semi- or non-compliant balloon), DCB, or DES. Optimal lesion preparation is defined as satisfying all of the followings: 1) a fully inflated balloon of the correct size for the vessel (balloon with vessel ratio \>0.90); 2) ≤35% residual stenosis; 3) TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 3; and 4) the absence of a flow-limiting coronary artery dissection.15 After successful lesion preparation, patients will receive either DCB or DES according to randomly allocated groups. In DCB group, commercially available DCB (Agent, Boston Scientific, USA) will be used. DCB angioplasty will be recommended as follows to fully optimized procedural results. First, DCB size should be 1:1 ratio with reference vessel size. Second, delivery time of DCB should be within 30 seconds. Third, total inflation time of DCB will be recommended from 30 to 60 seconds. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-08-18
- Primary completion
- 2027-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-12-31
- First posted
- 2025-05-02
- Last updated
- 2025-09-03
Locations
9 sites across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06954714. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.