Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06954714

Late-lumen Changes After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Lesions

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
256 (estimated)
Sponsor
Chonnam National University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to compare late-lumen loss (LLL) between DCB and DES to treat de novo coronary artery stenosis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Detailed description

Drug-eluting stent (DES) is the standard of care for patients with coronary artery disease who are eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1 During long-term follow-up, remained metallic stent strut continuously related with stent-related cardiovascular events.2 As an alternative option to DES, drug-coated balloon (DCB) which has benefit of having shorter DAPT maintenance duration due to the absence of metallic scaffolds and polymers, has been introduced. Based on meta-analysis based on many randomized clinical trials (RCT),3,4 its use has been established in in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents and DES.5 Furthermore, recent RCTs demonstrated efficacy and safety of DCB in de novo coronary lesions in small vessels with reference vessel size \<3.0mm.6,7 For the patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery lesions, REC-CAGEFREE I tested the non-inferiority of DCB angioplasty with DES implantation, irrespective of vessel diameter.8 Overall, 2272 patients were randomly assigned to the DCB or the DES group. At 2 years, adverse events occurred in 6.4% of DCB group and 3.4% of DES group and failed to prove the non-inferiority of DCB angioplasty (P for non-inferiority=0.65). Regarding the heterogenous results, it is questionable that DCB angioplasty for large de novo lesions is safe and effective compared with DES implantation. On this background, the current study aims to compare late-lumen loss (LLL) between DCB and DES to treat de novo coronary artery stenosis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREDrug-eluting stent implantationIVUS (OPTICROSS, Boston Scientific, USA) will be recommended to select proper size of predilatation balloon (semi- or non-compliant balloon), DCB, or DES. Optimal lesion preparation is defined as satisfying all of the followings: 1) a fully inflated balloon of the correct size for the vessel (balloon with vessel ratio \>0.90); 2) ≤35% residual stenosis; 3) TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 3; and 4) the absence of a flow-limiting coronary artery dissection.15 After successful lesion preparation, patients will receive either DCB or DES according to randomly allocated groups. In DES group, latest second-generation DES will be used in accordance with standard practice guideline.
PROCEDUREDrug-coated balloon angioplastyIVUS (OPTICROSS, Boston Scientific, USA) will be recommended to select proper size of predilatation balloon (semi- or non-compliant balloon), DCB, or DES. Optimal lesion preparation is defined as satisfying all of the followings: 1) a fully inflated balloon of the correct size for the vessel (balloon with vessel ratio \>0.90); 2) ≤35% residual stenosis; 3) TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 3; and 4) the absence of a flow-limiting coronary artery dissection.15 After successful lesion preparation, patients will receive either DCB or DES according to randomly allocated groups. In DCB group, commercially available DCB (Agent, Boston Scientific, USA) will be used. DCB angioplasty will be recommended as follows to fully optimized procedural results. First, DCB size should be 1:1 ratio with reference vessel size. Second, delivery time of DCB should be within 30 seconds. Third, total inflation time of DCB will be recommended from 30 to 60 seconds.

Timeline

Start date
2025-08-18
Primary completion
2027-12-31
Completion
2028-12-31
First posted
2025-05-02
Last updated
2025-09-03

Locations

9 sites across 1 country: South Korea

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06954714. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.