Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06921174
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Classical Perineal Massage Therapy Versus the Use of an Intravaginal Device to Reduce Postpartum Perineal Pain
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 140 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Instituto Sexológico Murciano · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
GA34.01 postpartum, a randomized design with a parallel group structure will be applied, randomly assigning participants into two groups. The first group will receive the traditional perineal massage therapy, while the second group will use the intravaginal device "Crescendo 2." In this study, a pre- and post-intervention evaluation will be conducted, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as the primary outcome measure and the Clinical Global Impression Scale as the secondary outcome measure.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Use of the "Crescendo 2" Intravaginal Device | Self-administered perineal massage at home with Crescendo device. Three times per week, 10 minutes each session, over a 12-week period. |
| PROCEDURE | Classical Perineal Massage Therapy | Performed manually by a pelvic floor physiotherapist. One 30-minute session per week for 12 weeks. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-03-27
- Primary completion
- 2025-06-01
- Completion
- 2025-08-31
- First posted
- 2025-04-10
- Last updated
- 2025-04-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06921174. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.