Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06913933
Static vs. Dynamic Progressive Splinting for Persistent Wrist Stiffness After DRF
A Two-Arm, Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Static Progressive Splinting Versus Dynamic Splinting for Improving Wrist PROM/AROM in Patients With Persistent Post-DRF Stiffness
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Al Hayah University In Cairo · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This randomized controlled trial will compare the effectiveness of static progressive splinting versus dynamic splinting for treating persistent wrist stiffness in adults ≥18 years old at least 8 weeks post distal radius fracture (DRF) injury. Both splinting modalities are provided as an adjunct to one weekly supervised therapy session over a 6-week period. The primary outcomes are wrist active and passive range of motion (AROM/PROM) measured using goniometry, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported wrist function (PRWE), overall satisfaction, and adverse events.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BEHAVIORAL | Static Progressive Splinting for Persistent Wrist Stiffness | A commercially available static progressive splint with a turnbuckle mechanism allowing fine-tuned adjustments in wrist flexion and extension. Instructional materials for home use including written guidelines and an adjustment log. |
| BEHAVIORAL | Dynamic Splinting for Persistent Wrist Stiffness | Materials: A commercially available dynamic (spring-loaded) splint designed for the wrist. An instructional manual and daily usage log for participants. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-04-17
- Primary completion
- 2026-04-17
- Completion
- 2026-04-17
- First posted
- 2025-04-06
- Last updated
- 2025-04-06
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06913933. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.