Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06910241

Lidocaine Versus Diphenhydramine to Achieve Local Anesthesia for Laceration Repairs

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100 (estimated)
Sponsor
Florida Atlantic University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Diphenhydramine, when injected locally, has been shown to achieve a certain level of local anesthesia. It has been documented for use in simple bedside procedures, however there is a gap in knowledge in its comparison to lidocaine. The purpose of the study is to determine if local infiltration of diphenhydramine is noninferior to the use of lidocaine 1% when trying to achieve local anesthesia for simple laceration repair. Patients who present to the emergency department with a simple laceration will be enrolled in the study. Patients will be evaluated for the pain of the injection as well as the pain of the laceration repair procedure post injection.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGLidocaineLidocaine local infiltration
DRUGDiphenhydramineDiphenhydramine local infiltration

Timeline

Start date
2025-09-03
Primary completion
2027-06-30
Completion
2028-06-30
First posted
2025-04-04
Last updated
2026-01-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06910241. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Lidocaine Versus Diphenhydramine to Achieve Local Anesthesia for Laceration Repairs (NCT06910241) · Clinical Trials Directory