NCT06897020

Child and Parental Satisfaction of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns In Primary Molars

Evaluation Of Child and Parental Satisfaction Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 50 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 4 Years – 8 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the child and parents satisfaction of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer : Is there a difference in the child and parents satisfaction levels between BioFlx crowns and zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars?" The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of Retention, occlusal wear, gingival health, as well as preparation time.

Detailed description

The management of severely decayed primary teeth in pediatric dentistry often requires the use of crowns to restore function and aesthetics. Traditional stainless-steel crowns (SSCs) have been widely used due to their durability and cost-effectiveness; however, their metallic appearance and lack of aesthetic appeal have prompted the development of alternative materials such as zirconia and Bioflx crown. Zirconia crowns are recognized for their superior aesthetics and biocompatibility, making them a preferred choice for parents who prioritize appearance. However, they can present challenges in terms of retention, preparation requirements, and cost. Bioflx crowns, a newer material in pediatric dentistry, aim to combine aesthetic appeal with flexibility and improved adaptability to tooth anatomy. Despite their growing popularity, limited research directly compares the child and parental satisfaction between zirconia and Bioflx crowns. It remains unclear which material offers the best balance of functional, aesthetic, and patient-centered outcomes.This gap in knowledge hinders evidence-based decision-making when selecting crowns for pediatric patients. Zirconia crowns have gained prominence in pediatric dentistry as an alternative to stainless steel crowns for primary molars. While SSCs have long been valued for their durability and ease of placement, their metallic appearance often presents an aesthetic concern for parents and patients. Zirconia crowns provide a more natural, tooth-colored alternative, making them a preferred option in cases where aesthetics is a priority. One of the main advantages of zirconia crowns is their biocompatibility, as they demonstrate lower plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation. Additionally, zirconia crowns offer superior mechanical properties, including high flexural strength and excellent fracture resistance, making them a long-lasting restorative option. Their wear resistance further supports their use in pediatric patients, particularly those with heavy occlusal forces. This study stems from the need to bridge the gap in current research regarding the satisfaction and the effectiveness associated with Bioflx crowns. Understanding whether Bioflx crowns offer superior aesthetic and functional outcomes compared to Zirconia crowns could influence clinical decision-making in pediatric dentistry. This is especially relevant as parents increasingly seek restorations that provide both durability and a natural appearance for their children.

Conditions

• Carious Primary Molars

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	(Group A: Bioflx crowns)	prepartion:1.The mesiodistal width of the tooth will be measured using calipers and a closely fitted crown will be selected based on the measurements. 2.The tooth will be prepared similarly to stainless steel crowns (SSCs): • Occlusal reduction of approximately 1-1.5 mm will be done using a diamond bur.Mesial and distal reduction of no more than 1 mm will be performed using a No. 169L diamond bur.Depending on the tooth anatomy, either no buccal and lingual reduction will be needed, or a minimal reduction will be done. 3.All sharp line angles and corners will be smoothed to ensure proper crown fit. 4.The crown will be checked for proper fit before cementation. It will be positioned to extend 1 mm below the gingival margin. 5.The crown will be cemented using luting glass ionomer cement (GIC). The crown will be held with firm, constant pressure until the cement sets initially. 6.The marginal fit will be evaluated, and necessary adjustments will be made. 7.The occlusion will be checked.
OTHER	(Group B: Preformed Zirconia crown	1. Crown Selection: The mesiodistal dimension of the corresponding tooth will be measured . to select the appropriate size. 2. Occlusal Reduction: The marginal ridge of adjacent teeth will be used as a reference point and a 1.5-2 mm of occlusal reduction will be performed to allow proper crown seating. 3. Bucco-Lingual Reduction: The bucco-lingual wall will be reduced by approximately 1-1.5 mm using a flame-shaped diamond bur. 4. Interproximal Reduction: 1mm of interproximal reduction will be performed using a flame-shaped diamond bur such as a .368 or .330tapered carbide bur. 5. Feather Margin Preparation: Subgingival reduction of 1-2 mm will be done using a flame-shaped diamond bur, creating a feathered margin to achieve a passive fit. 6. Trial Fitting of the Crown: The crown will be tried in to ensure proper adaptation. until the crown fits passively and extends sub gingivally by 1-2 mm wit. 7. Glass ionomer cement will be used for cementation.

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-06-01
• Primary completion: 2025-12-30
• Completion: 2026-02-26
• First posted: 2025-03-26
• Last updated: 2025-03-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt