NCT06885788

Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women：A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Study on the Effect of Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women： a Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 466 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Nanchong Central Hospital · Other Government
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.

Conditions

• Inguinal Hernia
• Laparoscopic Surgery
• Randomized Controlled Trial

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	To remove the uterine uterine ligament	Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-09-20
• Primary completion: 2026-12-31
• Completion: 2027-03-01
• First posted: 2025-03-20
• Last updated: 2025-03-25

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China