Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06864442

Thread Embedding vs. Electroacupuncture for Post-Stroke Aphasia

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Thread Embedding and Electroacupuncture in Speech-Language Rehabilitation in Patients With Post-Stroke Aphasia

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Loc Cong Dai Tran, MD · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial was to learn if thread embedding or electroacupuncture can treat language function impairment in patients with post-stroke aphasia, a condition affecting communication after a stroke. The main questions it aimed to answer were: Does thread embedding improve overall language function more effectively than electroacupuncture, as measured by the Goodglass and Kaplan Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS)? How do thread embedding and electroacupuncture compare in improving specific language skills, such as motor speech, sensory language, reading, and naming, as assessed by the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE)? Researchers compared thread embedding (TE group) to electroacupuncture (EA group) to see if thread embedding provides better or similar effects on language recovery. Participants: Underwent a 30-day intervention with language assessments at the start and end of the period. Were randomly assigned to either the thread embedding group, receiving treatment every 10 days, or the electroacupuncture group, receiving daily 20-minute sessions.

Detailed description

This study was designed as a randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial conducted at the Traditional Medicine Hospital in Dak Lak, Vietnam. It received ethical approval from the Biomedical Research Ethic Committee at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (Approval No. 739/HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD, dated December 14, 2021). The interventions were delivered by certified traditional medicine practitioners following strict protocols (STRICTA 2010). Catgut Thread Embedding (TE group): Participants received thread embedding at the EX-HN21 acupoint. Electroacupuncture (EA group): Participants underwent daily 20-minute sessions in 30 days. Language function was assessed using standardized tools, and data were analyzed with R. Statistical tests (chi-square, t-tests) compared baseline characteristics and outcomes, with a significance level of p \< 0.05.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURECatgut Thread EmbeddingCatgut Thread Embedding involved implanting chromic catgut size 4.0 thread, which is attached to a 23G guide needle, into subcutaneous tissue at EX-HN21 acupoint. The guide needle was removed after insertion, while the thread remained and dissolved over 10-15 days to provide continuous stimulation.
PROCEDUREElectroacupunctureElectroacupuncture was administered using four needles (0.3 × 25 mm, diameter × length) inserted at GV-20, EX-HN21, external EX-HN12, and external EX-HN13 acupoints. Electrical stimulation was delivered via the KWD-808I Multipurpose Health Device (Changzhou Yingdi Electronic Medical Device Co., China) with parameters set at 3 Hz frequency and 0.6 ms pulse width, the intensity was adjusted according to the patient's perception. Electroacupuncture was performed daily, except on Saturdays, Sundays, and Vietnamese national holidays, over a treatment course of 30 days.

Timeline

Start date
2021-08-01
Primary completion
2022-07-31
Completion
2022-07-31
First posted
2025-03-07
Last updated
2025-03-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Vietnam

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06864442. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.