Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT06855615
Comparison of Thrice-Daily Premixed Human Insulin With Basal-Bolus Therapy Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Comparison of Thrice-Daily Premixed Human Insulin With Basal-Bolus Therapy Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomised Cross-Over Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 44 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The goal of this cross-over study is to learn if thrice-daily (TDS) premixed human insulin (PHI) is as useful as basal-bolus (BB) therapy as an intensification treatment in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The main questions it aims to answer are: * To determine the efficacy of TDS PHI compared to BB insulin regimen by measuring HbA1c changes over 12 weeks. * To determine the changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, weight changes, and hypoglycaemia rate, and to study the adherence rate to insulin injection between the two regimens over 12 weeks. Researchers will compare TDS-PHI to BB regimen to see if the glycemic control, TDD of insulin, weight gain, hypoglycemia and adherence rate are the same. Participants will: * take TDS-PHI or BB for 12 weeks and cross over to the other regimen for another 12 weeks * visit the clinic once every 4 weeks for checkups and tests * keep a diary of their self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), insulin doses, hypoglycaemic symptoms and blood glucose readings, and the number of times they miss insulin injections.
Detailed description
Thrice-daily (TDS) biphasic insulin analogues are suitable alternatives for intensifying insulin therapy, but the clinical use of TDS premixed human insulin (PHI) is unclear. When people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) require intensification of treatment, twice daily (BD) PHI is often intensified to a basal-bolus (BB) regimen, but compliance can be poor. The investigators hypothesised that TDS PHI is as efficacious as BB therapy. A cross-over study comparing TDS PHI with BB regimens among people with T2DM is conducted primarily aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of TDS PHI (Mixtard® 30) with the BB insulin regimen (Insulatard® once daily plus thrice daily prandial Actrapid®) in T2DM with inadequate glycaemic control on BD PHI and to assess the changes in FPG, TDD of insulin, weight changes, hypoglycaemia rate, and rate of adherence to insulin injection in local setting. Participants receive TDS-PHI or BB for 12 weeks and cross over to the other regimen for another 12 weeks. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, weight, hypoglycaemia, and adherence to insulin injections over 12 weeks are measured.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Mixtard® 30 TDS | The clinical use of TDS premixed human insulin (PHI) is unclear. In contrast, biphasic insulin analogue given thrice daily is a well-proven, safe and suitable alternative to an intensified insulin regimen. |
| DRUG | Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid® | Basal bolus regimen is considered a physiological form of treatment and the standard of care in clinical practice but the multiple daily injections often lead to poor compliance. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-01-14
- Completion
- 2021-07-01
- First posted
- 2025-03-04
- Last updated
- 2025-03-04
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Malaysia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06855615. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.