NCT06838533

Patient Specific PEEK Versus Titanium Patient Specific Plates in The Fixation of Computer-Guided Advancement Genioplasty

Patient Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Miniplates Versus Titanium Genioplasty Plates in The Fixation of Computer-Guided Advancement Genioplasty

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 14 (actual)
• Sponsor: Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls · Other Government
• Sex: All
• Age: 17 Years – 50 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Evaluation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus titanium patient specific plates in the fixation of computer-guided advancement genioplasty.

Detailed description

Aim: Comparison between polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium patient specific plates in the fixation of computer-guided advancement genioplasty. Patients and Methods: This study included fourteen patients indicated for advancement genioplasty. Patients were assigned randomly into one of two equal groups. Group A (Control group) included seven patients who were treated by computer guided advancement genioplasty using patient specific titanium plates and Group B(Study group) involved seven patients who were treated by computer guided advancement genioplasty using patient specific PEEK plates.

Conditions

• Mandible; Deformity

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	computer guided advancement genioplasty	PEEK vs Titanium patient specific plates

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-03-03
• Primary completion: 2024-03-02
• Completion: 2024-10-01
• First posted: 2025-02-20
• Last updated: 2025-02-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt