Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06808412

To Explore the Efficacy of Sintilimab Combined With Bevacizumab in Rectal Cancer

A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab Combined With Bevacizumab in Perioperative Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118 (estimated)
Sponsor
xiaohua li · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a prospective, exploratory clinical study. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the pathological complete response (pCR) rate of tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer using sintilimab combined with bevacizumab. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with bevacizumab in the perioperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer. The study includes two cohorts: Cohort A involves a retrospective collection of rectal cancer patients who previously received the XELOX regimen in the perioperative setting. Cohort B includes rectal cancer patients undergoing perioperative treatment with sintilimab and bevacizumab combined with XELOX as a neoadjuvant regimen. Each of the trial group and historical control group requires 59 cases. The administration method for the trial group (Cohort B) is as follows: Sintilimab: 200 mg, intravenous, Day 1, every 3 weeks. Bevacizumab: 7.5 mg/kg, intravenous, Day 1, every 3 weeks. Chemotherapy regimen: XELOX regimen.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGsintilimab combined with bevacizumab and XELOXPatients with locally advanced low rectal cancer receiving sintilimab combined with bevacizumab and XELOX as a neoadjuvant regimen during the perioperative period.

Timeline

Start date
2024-07-05
Primary completion
2025-05-05
Completion
2025-06-05
First posted
2025-02-05
Last updated
2025-02-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06808412. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.