NCT06808308

Prognostic Value of PARS Classification for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Prognostic Value of PARS Classification in Predicting Post-recurrent Survival for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Salvage Radical Surgery

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 199 (actual)
• Sponsor: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years – 90 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the predictors of post-recurrent survival in locally recurrent rectal cancer patients undergoing salvage radical surgery. Based on the identified risk factors, investigators propose a new risk stratification to facilitate the development of strategies for surgical treatment and follow-up care.

Detailed description

With the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the local recurrence rate of rectal cancer after surgery has markedly decreased; however, 5-18% of patients still experience recurrence in the pelvic field, significantly affecting their quality of life and contributing to high mortality rates. Several clinical and histologic features have been associated with the development of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), including higher primary T/N stage, positive margins, distal tumors, and histopathologic risk features such as tumor deposits (TD), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PNI). Managing these recurrences is challenging, making risk stratification for re-recurrence through multidisciplinary evaluation essential for achieving personalized treatment in LRRC patients. Current imaging examinations typically stratify LRRC patients based on tumor recurrence patterns to guide clinical interventions. Due to primary treatment and varying local recurrence patterns, the pelvic fascial planes of LRRC patients are often altered or even absent, complicating surgery due to increased involvement of nearby organs or structures. Previous studies have indicated that surgical margin is the most crucial prognostic factor, with LRRC patients achieving R0 resections having a more favorable prognosis compared to those undergoing R1 or R2 resections or conservative treatments. Other potential features, such as gender, prior abdominoperineal resection, and advanced primary tumor stage, have been suggested to lead to poor post-recurrence prognoses; however, the prognostic impact of primary histologic risk features (TD, LVI, PNI) has rarely been addressed. Currently, there is no agreed-upon standardized treatment algorithm for LRRC, and nearly half of patients undergoing salvage radical surgery still experience re-recurrence within 12 months post-operation. The survival stratification of LRRC patients receiving salvage radical surgery remains underexplored.

Conditions

• Local Recurrence of Malignant Tumor of Rectum

Timeline

• Start date: 2011-01-01
• Primary completion: 2024-12-31
• Completion: 2024-12-31
• First posted: 2025-02-05
• Last updated: 2025-02-05