NCT06808048

Medical Cannabis and Behavior

Neurobehavioral Impacts of Medical Cannabis Use: An Observational Study

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 180 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Minnesota · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 35 Years – 65 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

This study will assess cognition, neural function, and drug exposure in chronic pain patients who have been prescribed medical cannabis and will differentiate outcomes based on use of specific CBD-dominant versus THC-dominant treatment products. This longitudinal study will recruit medical cannabis users from local dispensaries. Each participant will complete a baseline assessment prior to the start of medical cannabis use, monthly phone calls to assess treatment adherence, and a four-month follow- up assessment. The aims of this project are: Aim 1. To assess impacts of medical cannabis compounds on executive functions, learning and memory in adults to determine whether cognitive impairments are evident after the onset of cannabis use; Aim 2. To assess the impacts of medical cannabis compounds on white matter microstructure, functional brain activity and functional connectivity; Aim 3. To differentiate change over four months in these outcomes as a function of (a) age and (b) pre-to-post-treatment changes in blood levels of cannabinoid compounds.

Detailed description

This project was submitted to NIH in response to NOT-DA-22-003, Public Health Research on Cannabis. The overarching aim is to assess cognition, neural function, and SUD risk in a sample of patients treated with medical cannabis products in Minnesota (n=120) as compared to non-cannabis using controls (n=60) and to differentiate outcomes based on prescribed doses and blood concentrations of THC versus CBD as objective measures of drug exposure. Patients will be aged 35-65 and qualified for medicinal cannabis treatment in Minnesota due to diagnoses of chronic pain. While deficits in learning, memory and executive functions are reliably observed in young adult recreational cannabis users, it is unclear whether similar impairments characterize individuals who use cannabis for medical reasons, whether adults may be uniquely vulnerable to cannabis-related impairments or if, in fact, use in this age group might be neuroprotective. There are very few published studies of medical cannabis users that comprehensively focus on neurobehavioral outcomes even though at least 5 million people are registered for medical cannabis treatment in the United States. The current study will address this gap through a pre-post assessment of users as compared to matched controls (pain patients who do not use cannabis). Participants will be recruited through posted advertisements and through dispensaries via a collaboration with a local supplier of medical cannabis. They will complete a comprehensive pre-treatment behavioral assessment as well as multimodal brain MRI assessments. All measures will be repeated after four months of treatment. Participants will be interviewed monthly by phone in the interval between visits to assess treatment adherence, pain levels, quality of life, and substance use. Blood cannabinoid levels will be measured at baseline and after four months and will be correlated with behavioral and neural outcomes. The three aims are (1) To assess impacts of medical cannabis compounds on cognition and behavior in otherwise cannabis-naive adults to determine whether impairments that characterize younger users are evident after the onset of medical cannabis use; the investigation will also measure treatment-related changes in pain using well-validated measures. (2) To similarly assess the impacts of medical cannabis compounds on white matter microstructure, functional brain activity and functional connectivity using diffusion-weighted scans, task-based fMRI, and measures of resting state connectivity; (3) To differential change over time in these outcomes as a function of (a) exposure to distinct cannabinoids (THC vs. CBD) as assessed through blood concentrations and (b) age. Sex as a biological variable will be assessed as a covariate of interest. Thus, this proposal will yield a rich dataset through which medical cannabis effects on adults' neurobehavioral function can be assessed and contrasted with the literature on non-medical users.

Conditions

• Chronic Pain Patients
• Medical Cannabis Users

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
BEHAVIORAL	Cognitive testing	Participants will complete a cognitive testing battery that includes measures of attention, learning, memory, problem-solving and executive function.
BEHAVIORAL	Task-based fMRI measure of inhibitory control	All participants will complete a task-based fMRI measure of inhibitory control. This Go/No-Go task provides a contrast of BOLD signals when response conflict is low (execution of motor responses on frequent Go trials) vs high (inhibiting the prepotent response on infrequent NoGo trials). It will provide an assessment of the effects of cannabis use on the frontostriatal implicit motor learning and cognitive control systems. Participants view shapes and press a button quickly (Go trials) to every shape except circles and squares (NoGo Trials). To increase response prepotency, Go trials are frequent (75%). Button presses must be rapid to be considered correct. The task uses an event-related design with each stimulus presented for 600 ms, followed by a 1.0-4.5 second jittered ISI during which a white fixation crosshair is displayed. Trial type is pseudo-randomized with the constraint of equal frequencies of consecutive Go trials (2, 3, or 4) between NoGo trials.
BEHAVIORAL	Task-based fMRI measure of face-name learning	This task is ideally suited to assess cannabis effects on explicit associative learning and memory as mediated by frontohippocampal networks. Participants memorize names corresponding to faces (encoding phase), and then recall the names after a short delay. The first encoding block begins with a 2-second cue ("MEMORIZE") followed by 5 face-name pairs, each shown for 4 seconds; participants press a button when they encode each face-name pair. A distractor block follows. Next, a retrieval block begins with a cue to "RECALL" followed by presentations of each of the same 5 faces, now paired with "???" (i.e., prompting recall of previously paired names), with a 4 second stimulus duration and no ISI. On recall trials, participants press a button to indicate that they have recalled the name for the displayed face. Participants engage in silent uncued recall of face-name pairs. Immediately following the scan, participants are tested for accuracy of name retrieval.

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-06-18
• Primary completion: 2029-07-15
• Completion: 2029-07-31
• First posted: 2025-02-05
• Last updated: 2025-06-29

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States