Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06800638

Comprehensive Review of Retinal Pseudo-Holes: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Management

Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Approaches, Pathophysiology, and Management of Retinal Pseudo-Holes: a Comprehensive Synthesis of 35 Peer-Reviewed Studies

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
10 (actual)
Sponsor
Mohammad Reza Tokhmehchi · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Retinal pseudo-holes (RPH) are macular abnormalities that mimic macular holes (MH) but lack full-thickness retinal disruption. This systematic review, based on 35 studies, explores their clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management. Diagnosis: Differentiating RPH from MH is challenging due to overlapping symptoms such as central scotomas and visual distortion. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become the gold standard for diagnosis, surpassing older imaging techniques like fundus photography and fluorescein angiography. OCT provides detailed, non-invasive imaging that helps identify RPH's hallmark feature: a foveal depression without retinal break. Pathophysiology: RPH is primarily caused by mechanical forces exerted on the macula by epiretinal membranes (ERM) and vitreomacular traction (VMT). These forces distort the retina, creating a pseudo-hole. Risk factors include aging, high myopia, trauma, and diabetes. Management: Many RPH cases are managed conservatively with regular monitoring, as the condition often remains stable. Surgical intervention, such as pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with membrane peeling, is reserved for symptomatic cases with significant visual impairment. Surgery has shown promising outcomes, with most patients experiencing improved visual acuity. Research Needs: Further studies are needed to explore the long-term outcomes of RPH, identify factors predicting progression to MH, and assess the utility of advanced imaging techniques like OCT angiography in improving diagnosis and monitoring. This review underscores the importance of accurate differentiation between RPH and MH to ensure appropriate management and avoid unnecessary treatments.

Detailed description

This is a REVIEW study on Retinal pseudo-holes.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2024-06-01
Primary completion
2024-08-20
Completion
2024-09-25
First posted
2025-01-30
Last updated
2025-01-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Iran

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06800638. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.