Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06793553
Induction Therapy of PTX+BV Followed by Atezolizumab+Nab-PTX for PD-L1+ TNBC
Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Paclitaxel+Bevacizumab INDUCtion Followed by at atEzolizumab+Nab-paclitaxel for PD-L1-positive Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (JBCRG-M10, CMA-0196) (INDUCE Trial)
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 106 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Japan Breast Cancer Research Group · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The objective of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment strategy to administer atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel (PTX) following 2 cycles of induction therapy with PTX + bevacizumab (induction treatment strategy) in programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in comparison with the standard atezolizumab + nab-PTX therapy.
Detailed description
The objective of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment strategy to administer atezolizumab + nab-PTX following 2 cycles of induction therapy with PTX + bevacizumab (induction treatment strategy) in PD-L1-positive mTNBC in comparison with the standard atezolizumab + nab-PTX therapy in a rondomized phase II design. It is hypothesized in this research that in patients with PD-L1-positive mTNBC, 2 cycles of PTX+ bevacizumab induction therapy induce early response and an immune microenvironment conducive to the benefits of immunotherapy, and improve progression-free survival as compared with the standard treatment with atezolizumab + nab-PTX therapy (standard treatment group). The primary objective of this research is to investigate this hypothesis. A key secondary objective is to compare the 2-year PFS rate between the induction therapy group and the standard treatment group in order to assess the long-term effect of the induction treatment strategy. Furthermore, in patients in the induction therapy group who are not assessed as PD in the first imaging assessment, the 2-year PFS rate will be compared to the reference value expected in a historical control to examine the benefits of the induction therapy. Other secondary objectives are to compare the response rate and the disease control rate as efficacy endpoints and to evaluate the effect of the induction treatment strategy on early PD. Overall survival (OS) will also be compared. In addition, with the aim of exploring the mechanism by which the induction treatment strategy contributes to enhancement of the effect of the standard treatment with atezolizumab + nab-PTX therapy, the immune status in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood will be evaluated, and its relationship with antitumor effects will be investigated. For evaluation of efficacy and safety in the induction therapy group, 2 cycles of induction therapy + immunochemotherapy will be evaluated as a series of treatments.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Induction therapy | 2 cycles of PTX+ bevacizumab induction therapy followed by atezolizumab+nab-PTX |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-09-13
- Primary completion
- 2026-03-31
- Completion
- 2028-09-30
- First posted
- 2025-01-27
- Last updated
- 2025-01-30
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Japan
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06793553. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.