NCT06781398

Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Deep Endometriosis: Da Vinci Vs HUGO RAS Comparison

Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Deep Endometriosis: Da Vinci Vs HUGO RAS Compared

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 86 (estimated)
• Sponsor: IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years – 55 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim is to clarify whether both surgical approaches represent, equivalently, a good treatment for the management of patients with deep endometriosis who are candidates for surgery, or whether there are any differences between the two methods, and, if so, how they differ

Detailed description

Numerous studies have shown how surgical excision of deep endometriosis nodules improves pain and quality of life. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been employed for the treatment of deep endometriosis. While the Da Vinci System is widely used for the surgical treatment of endometriosis, with good results, the available data regarding the benefits of the HUGO RAS System, however, are limited, given the recent introduction of this method in gynecology, and particularly in the treatment of endometriosis. The aim of the study is to investigate whether the robotic surgical approach using HUGO RAS is noninferior to that performed using Da Vinci in terms of operative time (docking + surgical time) in the surgical treatment of patients with endometriosis

Conditions

• Deep Endometriosis

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-01-01
• Primary completion: 2027-07-01
• Completion: 2027-10-01
• First posted: 2025-01-17
• Last updated: 2025-01-17

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Italy