Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06772259

Comparison of the Effect of Two Different Interventions

Comparison of the Effect of Two Different Interventions on Pain and Fear in Peripheric Intravenous Catheterization in Children: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90 (actual)
Sponsor
Sakarya University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
5 Years – 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of two different non-pharmacologic interventions with the control group in reducing pain due to peripheral intravenous catheterization application in children aged 5-12 years. Hypotheses: H1: Pain level differs in the group that received PIK with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group. H2: The level of fear in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator differs from the control group. H3: Satisfaction level is different in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group. H4: The pain level differs in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H5: The level of fear is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H6: Satisfaction level is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H7: Pain level is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group. H8: The level of fear is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group. H9: The satisfaction level in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator is different from the cartoon group. H10: PIK application time is different in the palm stimulator group compared to the control group. H11: PIK application time is different in the cartoon group compared to the co

Detailed description

1. To measure the pain and fear levels of children by placing a palm stimulator on their palms during PIK application 2. Measuring pain and fear levels by watching cartoons to children during PIK application

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEPalm StimulatorThe apparatus is 1.6 cm in diameter and 4 cm long. It has a cylindrical, non-slippery and easy-to-grasp structure for maximum contact with the palm
OTHERCartoonThe cartoon was projected on a blank wall in the intervention room with a projection device. The cartoon was played in preparation for the PIK procedure and children were allowed to watch it until the procedure was completed.

Timeline

Start date
2023-10-01
Primary completion
2023-12-01
Completion
2024-03-30
First posted
2025-01-13
Last updated
2025-01-13

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06772259. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.