Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06772103

Biceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Rotator Cuff Tears

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100 (estimated)
Sponsor
Clinique Générale dAnnecy · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
40 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double-loop 360 lasso biceps tenodesis for the treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) during shoulder arthroscopy in patients without arthroscopic rotator cuff tears. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. However, these studies were carried out on patients with rotator cuff tears, and so it has not been possible to directly compare the two procedures. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis in patients without rotator cuff tears. Given its potential advantages, autobloc biceps tenodesis could become the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients with long biceps tendon pathology.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREself-locking biceps tenodesisThe LHB tendon is detached from its origin at the level of the superior labrum. This technique supports the self-locking mechanism of the LHB tendon in the bicipital groove by detaching the tendon from the Y-shaped superior glenoid, including the superior labrum. A radiographically visible suture will be attached to the proximal part of the LHB tendon to facilitate subsequent localization of the LHB tendon during imaging (3-0 stainless steel, ethicon).
PROCEDUREBiceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture anchorThe LHB tendon is detached from its origin and sutured. Next, the LHB tendon is fixed in the bicipital groove using a 360-loop tenodesis technique with the Knotless FiberTak® biceps implant system. A radiographically visible suture will be attached to the proximal part of the LHB tendon to facilitate subsequent localization of the LHB tendon during imaging (3-0 stainless steel, ethicon).

Timeline

Start date
2025-01-22
Primary completion
2027-12-31
Completion
2028-02-28
First posted
2025-01-13
Last updated
2025-02-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06772103. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.