Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06755125

Effects of KinesioTaping Versus Dry Needling in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain Among Females.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88 (actual)
Sponsor
Sehat Medical Complex · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
20 Years – 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects of kinesio taping and dry needling on sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain due to piriformis muscle tightness among females aged 20 to 50 years. The main research questions it aimed to answer were: Null Hypothesis (H₀): There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of kinesio taping and dry needling on SIJ pain caused by piriformis muscle tightness. Alternate Hypothesis (H₁): There was a significant difference in the effectiveness of kinesio taping and dry needling on SIJ pain caused by piriformis muscle tightness. All study participants provided both written and verbal consent. The research was prospective and randomized. The investigation was conducted on individuals between the ages of 20 and 50 during follow-up visits. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 45 participants were selected. Subjects who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received a hot pack, TENS, piriformis simple stretching and isometric exercises, along with kinesio taping. Group B received a hot pack, TENS, simple stretching and isometric exercises, along with dry needling. Piriformis tightness was diagnosed using the Piriformis test, and by assessing hip internal rotation and adduction. Sacroiliac joint pain was detected using the Posterior Pain Provocation Test, Gaenslen's Test, and Patrick's Test. At the beginning of the treatment, all participants underwent pretest measurements using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Goniometer, Functional Gait Assessment, and Oswestry Disability Index.

Detailed description

All research participants were fully informed about the goals, duration, treatment protocols used within the boundaries of the study, any potential side effects, and concerns that could arise. All study participants provided both written and verbal consent. The research was prospective and randomized. The investigation was conducted on individuals between the ages of 20 and 50 during follow-up visits. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 45 participants were selected. Subjects who intended to participate were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received hot packs, TENS, piriformis simple stretching and isometrics, along with the use of kinesio taping. Group B received hot packs, TENS, simple stretching and isometrics, along with the use of dry needling. Piriformis tightness was diagnosed using the Piriformis test, and by assessing hip internal rotation and adduction, whereas sacroiliac joint pain was detected using the Posterior Pain Provocation Test, Gaenslen's Test, and Patrick's Test. At the beginning of the treatment, all participants underwent pretest measurements using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Goniometer, Functional Gait Assessment, and Oswestry Disability Index.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERKinesio TapingPatients in Group A was treated with a hot pack, TENS, simple piriformis stretch, and isometrics, along with kinesio taping. Kinesio tape was applied directly to the muscle with 50% stretching.During the treatment, kinesio tape will be applied to the patients twice a week, eight times in total.
OTHERDry NeedlingPatients in Group B was treated with a hot pack, TENS, simple piriformis stretch, and isometrics, along with dry needling.During the treatment, dry needling was applied to the patients twice a week, eight times in total.

Timeline

Start date
2025-01-10
Primary completion
2025-03-18
Completion
2025-03-24
First posted
2025-01-01
Last updated
2025-03-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06755125. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.