Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT06754969

Does RPNI Reduce Incidence of Neuroma Formation Following Sural Nerve Biopsy

Does RPNI Reduce Incidence of Neuroma Formation Following Sural Nerve Biopsy: a Pilot Study

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20 (estimated)
Sponsor
University of British Columbia · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of our project is to determine if incorporating preventative surgical techniques such as regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI) into sural nerve biopsy can reduce the incidence of symptomatic neuroma formation. Findings from this study will inform best practice guidelines and can dramatically impact patient care, improve patient quality of life, and reduce the number of required repeat operations.

Detailed description

Neuromas are a known complication from traumatic injury or surgery, including nerve biopsies. Neuromas are formed by non-neoplastic aberrant proliferation of injured nerves that cannot innervate an end target resulting in a neuroma bulb made of free nerve ends, fibrotic tissue, and blood vessels. Neuromas can cause significant, debilitating pain resulting in decreased quality of life for patients and potential repeat operative interventions. The incidence rate of neuroma formation following injury is not well described but previous literature reports rates up to 30% with 14% of patients requiring repeat operation. In order to address this problem, numerous preventative and therapeutic measures have been explored. Nonsurgical management options such as desensitization, anesthetic and/or steroid injections, analgesia, and nerve stimulation have yielded mixed results.10 Therefore there is a need for reproducible and reliable prevention and treatment strategies for painful neuroma. Currently, the main surgical interventions consist of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI). In TMR, free nerve ends are transferred onto recipient motor nerves, whereas in RPNI, free nerve ends are wrapped in a free muscle graft. Both methods provide denervated muscle targets for nerve ends. Compared to TMR, and other microsurgical measures such as primary repair or nerve grafting, RPNI is a much simpler operation that can easily be performed in the minor procedures or ward setting where nerve biopsies are usually completed. Given the functional impact from painful neuromas and subsequent burden on operative resources, efforts should be taken to prevent neuroma formation with RPNI at time of biopsy. Our project could directly improve patient care by substantiating the need for preventative measures for neuroma formation during for sural nerve biopsy thereby changing the standard of care. Given the significant pain, decreased quality of life, and need for repeat interventions, incorporating RPNI could have dramatic impacts on patient care and reduce operative and resources burdens.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREPeripheral Nerve Regenerative Interface (RPNI) and Nerve/Muscle BiopsyRPNI is a surgical technique which wraps denervated muscle targets around severed nerve ends.
PROCEDUREBiopsy AloneSural nerve and muscle biopsy performed in the standard fashion.

Timeline

Start date
2025-03-01
Primary completion
2026-08-01
Completion
2026-12-01
First posted
2025-01-01
Last updated
2025-01-01

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: Canada

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06754969. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.