NCT06740292

InterFlex Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates in the Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures.

InterFlex Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates in the Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 18 (actual)
• Sponsor: Alexandria University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

the study aims to compare InterFlex plate with conventional miniplates in management of symphyseal mandibular fracture clinically regarding pain, wound healing and postoperative occlusion, and radiographically regrading bone density.

Detailed description

A total of 18 patients with recent symphyseal mandibular fractures were allocated into two groups. Group A, comprising 9 patients, underwent treatment with the InterFlex plate, while Group B, also consisting of 9 patients, was treated with conventional two miniplates. Clinical evaluations were carried at multiple intervals up to 12 weeks postoperatively, with radiographic assessments performed immediately after surgery and at 12 weeks to measure mean bone density at the fracture line.

Conditions

• Anterior Mandibular Fracture

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	conventional miniplates	conventional miniplates in double configuration
DEVICE	InterFlex plates	InterFlex plates in configuration

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-01-25
• Primary completion: 2024-12-01
• Completion: 2024-12-01
• First posted: 2024-12-18
• Last updated: 2024-12-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt