NCT06721000

Patient Control Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural.

Patient Control Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural After Total Hip Replacement

• Status: Enrolling By Invitation
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 60 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 19 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

As one of the complications of THR is post operative pain, which usually requires epidural catheter insertion. We are comparing the effect of patient control epidural versus conventional epidural for patient's satisfaction.

Detailed description

More than 20 years of successful usage of epidural analgesia for post operative pain treatment include intermittent provider-administer bolus, patient control analgesia and continuous epidural infusion with or without patient control epidural analgesia. The main drawback of conventional epidural infusion is that it does not allow for individual variation in management of pain. As a result, patient control epidural analgesia has replaced it in recent years.3. It has been demonstrated that continuous epidural infusion with patient control epidural analgesia is highly effective at providing consistent analgesia, improving patient satisfaction, and reducing the workload of anesthesia provider but it is linked to higher local anesthetic consumption4 In patient undergoing THR, patient control epidural analgesia may be considered as an appropriate alternative for managing post operative pain.

Conditions

• Post Operative Pain, Acute
• Sedation Score
• Degree of Motor Block
• Length of Hospital Stay
• Amount of Analgesic Used

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-11-10
• Primary completion: 2024-05-30
• Completion: 2025-01-25
• First posted: 2024-12-06
• Last updated: 2024-12-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan