NCT06706167

Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars

Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars: Randomized Control Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 75 (actual)
• Sponsor: Delta University for Science and Technology · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 3 Years – 8 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare clinically three different crowns for primary molars; stainless steel crown, zirconia crown and Bioflx crown. the main questions it aims to answer are: is Bioflex crown is an alternative to stainless steel crown and zirconia crown? Seventy-five patients their age range between 3 and 8 years participated in this study. The participants are divided into three groups representing group A for stainless steel crown (n=25), group B for zirconia crown (n=25) and group C for Bioflx crown (n=25). Plaque index, crown retentivity and gingival index will be evaluated at evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Conditions

• Decayed Teeth
• Carious Lesion

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	stainless steel crown	Participants in this arm received a stainless steel crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected based on the clinical assessment of the patient's dental need.
DEVICE	Zirconia crown	Participants in this arm received a zirconia crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected to provide a more aesthetic and durable option compared to stainless steel.
DEVICE	Bioflx crown	Participants in this arm received a Bioflx crown, which is a flexible, biocompatible material often used for pediatric crowns.

Timeline

• Start date: 2023-09-01
• Primary completion: 2024-09-01
• Completion: 2024-09-30
• First posted: 2024-11-26
• Last updated: 2024-12-04

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt