Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT06686368
Comparative Efficacy Study to Demonstrate the Non-inferiority of I-DROP® MGD Versus 2 Competitor Eye Drops in Managing Evaporative Dry Eye
Comparative Efficacy of I-DROP®MGD Versus Competing Eye Drops in Managing Evaporative Dry Eye: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- I-MED Pharma · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
A Pilot Comparative study between I-DROP MGD vs two commercially available lubricant eye drops for the management of evaporative dry eye
Detailed description
Pilot, randomized, double-blind, prospective, non-inferiority study to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of I-DROP MGD vs two commercially available preservative-free lubricant eye drops for the management of evaporative dry eye
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | I-DROP MGD | All drops are to be used for 28-30 days, twice daily with assessment done at Day 0, 30 minutes post-installation at day 0, day 7 and day 28/30 |
| DEVICE | Theloze Duo | All drops are to be used for 28-30 days, twice daily with assessment done at Day 0, 30 minutes post-installation at day 0, day 7 and day 28/30 |
| DEVICE | Systane Complete PF | All drops are to be used for 28-30 days, twice daily with assessment done at Day 0, 30 minutes post-installation at day 0, day 7 and day 28/30 |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-11-15
- Primary completion
- 2025-03-31
- Completion
- 2025-03-31
- First posted
- 2024-11-13
- Last updated
- 2024-11-13
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06686368. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.