Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT06686368

Comparative Efficacy Study to Demonstrate the Non-inferiority of I-DROP® MGD Versus 2 Competitor Eye Drops in Managing Evaporative Dry Eye

Comparative Efficacy of I-DROP®MGD Versus Competing Eye Drops in Managing Evaporative Dry Eye: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (estimated)
Sponsor
I-MED Pharma · Industry
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

A Pilot Comparative study between I-DROP MGD vs two commercially available lubricant eye drops for the management of evaporative dry eye

Detailed description

Pilot, randomized, double-blind, prospective, non-inferiority study to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of I-DROP MGD vs two commercially available preservative-free lubricant eye drops for the management of evaporative dry eye

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEI-DROP MGDAll drops are to be used for 28-30 days, twice daily with assessment done at Day 0, 30 minutes post-installation at day 0, day 7 and day 28/30
DEVICETheloze DuoAll drops are to be used for 28-30 days, twice daily with assessment done at Day 0, 30 minutes post-installation at day 0, day 7 and day 28/30
DEVICESystane Complete PFAll drops are to be used for 28-30 days, twice daily with assessment done at Day 0, 30 minutes post-installation at day 0, day 7 and day 28/30

Timeline

Start date
2024-11-15
Primary completion
2025-03-31
Completion
2025-03-31
First posted
2024-11-13
Last updated
2024-11-13

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06686368. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.