Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06655168
Orotracheal Intubation in Newborns: Videolaryngoscopy Vs Direct Laryngoscopy
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 115 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Tunis University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 1 Minute – 30 Days
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group)
Detailed description
prospective randomized study including newborns , requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Video Laryngoscopy | orotracheal intubation by C-Mac ( Video laryngoscopy) |
| DEVICE | Direct Laryngoscopy | Orotracheal intubation using Direct Laryngoscopy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2023-12-17
- Primary completion
- 2025-03-31
- Completion
- 2025-03-31
- First posted
- 2024-10-23
- Last updated
- 2024-10-23
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Tunisia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06655168. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.