NCT06649526

Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 70 (actual)
• Sponsor: Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital · Other Government
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 65 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation

Detailed description

Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared

Conditions

• Anesthesia

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope	The present study will compare the images of two different VLs with Macintosh blades (the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Hugemed videolaryngoscope) in both indirect (screen images) and direct (images viewed through the mouth) laryngoscopy.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-09-01
• Primary completion: 2024-11-01
• Completion: 2024-11-01
• First posted: 2024-10-18
• Last updated: 2024-10-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)