Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06618599

Mid-transverse Process Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block

Analgesic Effect of Mid-transverse Process to Pleura Block Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block in Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (estimated)
Sponsor
Cairo University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to compare efficacy of Mid-transverse process to pleura block combined with erector spinae block versus paravertebral plane block in cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy surgeries.

Detailed description

Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) application has also been used in recent years due to the lower incidence of side effects. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB)has been used as a part of multimodal analgesia in recent years. In ESPB is aimed to treat the postoperative pain of the thoracoabdominal region by injecting a local anesthetic into the interfacial area under the erector spinae muscle . ESPB creates an effect that covers the posterior and lateral thorax by affecting the dorsal rami and branches of the spinal nerves . Midtransverse process to pleura (MTP) block is less invasive as the position of the needle in this block is midway between the transverse process' posterior border and the pleura. Due to fenestrations present in the superior costotransverse ligament (SCTL), the drug reaches the paravertebral space

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREMid-transverse process to pleura block combined with erector spinae blockThe probe will be placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process and the transverse process will be identified. The needle will be introduced in an in-plane fashion until the tip lay deep in the erector spinae muscle. One milliliter of normal saline will be injected to confirm the correct needle tip position by visualizing the spread under the erector spinae muscle. 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected .The needle will be directed aiming for the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura from cephalad to caudad. One milliliter of normal saline will be given to confirm the position of the needle tip, then a total of 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine will be injected
PROCEDUREparavertebral blockthe transducer will be positioned laterally 3 cm to the midline at T5 spinous process, defining the spinous process, pleura, transverse process, the paravertebral (PV) space, and superior costotransverse ligament. The trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles will be recognized as superficial to the hyperechoic transverse process shadow. However, when the rhomboid major muscle disappeared, this indicated that we will be at the 7th thoracic vertebra's level. Local infiltration using 2-3 mL of 2.0% lignocaine will be done. A spinal 22-gauge needle will be injected at the cephalic side of the transducer using an in-plane technique, and the needle directed towards the costotransverse ligament (CTL). The passage of the needle through the CTL will be associated with a pop, informing that the superior costotransverse ligament will be passed. Following a 3 mL testing dose of normal saline containing epinephrine (1:200,000), 30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% injected.

Timeline

Start date
2024-10-01
Primary completion
2026-05-01
Completion
2026-06-01
First posted
2024-10-01
Last updated
2026-03-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06618599. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.