NCT06595667

Fluid Responsiveness in Posterior Fossa Tumor Resection: PPV and CVP Guidance

Fluid Responsiveness Assessment in Adult Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Posterior Fossa Tumor Resection in the Park Bench Position: a Comparison Between Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Guidance

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 50 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Chiang Mai University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

To answer the question: What are the differences in intraoperative fluid administration volumes between PPV and CVP-guided strategies during posterior fossa tumor resection in the park bench position?

Detailed description

Prospective RCT is conducted to compared the amount of fluid volume in adult patients undergoing posterior fossa surgery in park bench position.

Conditions

• Posterior Fossa Tumor
• Brain Tumor Adult

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Pulse pressure variation	Fluid administration during posterior fossa surgery in the parkbench position is guided by the PPV value.
PROCEDURE	Central venous pressure	Fluid administration during posterior fossa surgery in the parkbench position is guided by the CVP value.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-09-02
• Primary completion: 2025-09-20
• Completion: 2025-10-31
• First posted: 2024-09-19
• Last updated: 2024-09-19

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Thailand