Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06582342
Is the 3D-PANC MSP Model Superior to CT for Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in PCA Patients?
Is 3-D Imaging Technology Superior to Computed Tomography in Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Borderline or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma?
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 70 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Prospective multicenter study in which all patients with borderline or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcioma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical exploration with curative intent will be included for one year. Preoperative images by traditional CT and 3D-MSP technology will be evaluated, comparing the accuracy variables (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, area under the curve, concordance index) of both techniques with the gold standard (results of surgery and histopathological analysis).
Detailed description
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery represents the treatment of choice for patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). Despite being the diagnostic technique of choice for PAC staging, computed tomography (CT) has a very low accuracy in detecting those patients who may benefit from surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Consequently, the study of computerized image processing technologies is gaining importance. However, there are no prospective validation studies of these technologies to determine their usefulness in the preoperative evaluation of PCA patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. A prospective multicenter study in which all patients with borderline or locally advanced PAC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical exploration with curative intent will be included for one year. Preoperative images by traditional CT and 3D-MSP technology will be evaluated, comparing the accuracy variables (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, area under the curve, concordance index) of both techniques with the gold standard (results of surgery and histopathological analysis). A prospective, multicenter study with control group will be performed. Since this is the evaluation of a diagnostic test, it will not be necessary to randomize the patients included, since each patient will be evaluated by means of both techniques under study, thus serving as his or her own control.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Three dimensional imaging technology (3D-PANC MSP model) | The processing of the CT images obtained in each center for the creation of the 3D model will be performed centrally by the team of radiologists and computer scientists of the company Cella Medical Solutions. This team will be blinded to the reports of the CT scans.For each patient 4 NCCN check-lists will be filled in without knowing the result of the surgery or the AP study: 2 based on the conventional CT and two based on the 3D-MSP study. |
| PROCEDURE | Computerized tomography group (conventional CT) | A multiphase CT (venous phase and pancreatographic phase) with 1mm thick slices and series of images in coronal, axial and sagittal reconstructions will be performed. This CT model will be performed at disease diagnosis and after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Both CT scans will be independently reported by a radiologist from the hospital of origin. The preoperative CT scan will also be evaluated a posteriori by a radiologist from the sponsoring center with expertise in PAC. Both reports (the one from the radiologist of the center and the one from the radiologist of the sponsoring center) will be used to fill out the imaging study variables sheet based on the latest version of the NCCN 2022 guidelines. The radiologists will not know the outcome of the surgery or the anatomic pathology study at the time of the completion of the report. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-03-21
- Primary completion
- 2025-12-21
- Completion
- 2025-12-30
- First posted
- 2024-09-03
- Last updated
- 2025-08-06
Locations
17 sites across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06582342. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.