Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06550856
SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY VERSUS OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Sohag University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The present study will be conducted to assess whether there is a direct benefit associated with modified-Graham's omentopexy (MGO), above and beyond the benefit associated with Graham's omentopexy (GO) in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. We attempted to answer the question whether primary closure of the perforation in MGO will affect the outcome of surgery. Complication rates will be compared for the two alternative surgical procedures.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER | Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired using full thickness suture closure using 3/0 vicryl suture then omental patch laied over the sutures. |
| PROCEDURE | OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER | Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired by using omental patch without any attempt for primary closure of perforation. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-07-15
- Primary completion
- 2025-05-01
- Completion
- 2025-05-01
- First posted
- 2024-08-13
- Last updated
- 2024-08-13
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06550856. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.