Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06550856

SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY VERSUS OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (estimated)
Sponsor
Sohag University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The present study will be conducted to assess whether there is a direct benefit associated with modified-Graham's omentopexy (MGO), above and beyond the benefit associated with Graham's omentopexy (GO) in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. We attempted to answer the question whether primary closure of the perforation in MGO will affect the outcome of surgery. Complication rates will be compared for the two alternative surgical procedures.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURESUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCERPatients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired using full thickness suture closure using 3/0 vicryl suture then omental patch laied over the sutures.
PROCEDUREOMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCERPatients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired by using omental patch without any attempt for primary closure of perforation.

Timeline

Start date
2024-07-15
Primary completion
2025-05-01
Completion
2025-05-01
First posted
2024-08-13
Last updated
2024-08-13

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06550856. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.