NCT06541912

Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft & Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated vs Conventional Implants

Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft and Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated Versus Conventional Implants - A Randomized Clinical Trial.

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 12 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants.

Detailed description

Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants. The objectives are to access the primary and secondary implant stability using Resonance frequency analysis, marginal bone level using RVG with grid, healing of the soft tissue. The control group will be treated with conventional implant and test group will be treated with UV implants. The total number of participants are 12 and 24 sites (control - 12 sites, test - 12 sites) with 3 months follow up.

Conditions

• UV Dental Implant

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	conventional implant	A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. Conventional implant placement was done on one side. Resonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and check the primary stability of the implant. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures.
PROCEDURE	UV implant	A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia and osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions. Parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. UV implant was activated using UV Activator2 and placed in another site. Resonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and primary stability of the implant was measured. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-02-15
• Primary completion: 2026-03-25
• Completion: 2026-03-25
• First posted: 2024-08-07
• Last updated: 2024-08-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: India