Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT06537388
High Frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Conventional Positive Pressure Ventilation for EBUS
Comparison of High Frequency Jet Ventilation and Conventional Positive Pressure Ventilation for Endobronchial Ultrasound Examinations
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 428 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Erasme University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is frequently used in pneumology for diagnostic procedures like mediastinal biopsies. This procedure is usually done under general anesthesia. Different methods of ventilation are used according to center and physician preferences. In this retrospective study, complications of 2 types of ventilation will be analyzed: * High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) * Conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) Descriptive statistics will be used to present the data. Both ventilation techniques will be compared after propensity score matching. For HFJV patients from 2019 will be analyzed and for IPPV patients from 2023, as the team changed its practice over time.
Conditions
- Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation
- High-Frequency Jet Ventilation
- Ultrasonography, Interventional
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Ventilation type | Type of ventilation used during the EBUS procedure, either HFJV or IPPV |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-08-15
- Primary completion
- 2025-03-30
- Completion
- 2025-05-01
- First posted
- 2024-08-05
- Last updated
- 2025-05-21
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Belgium
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06537388. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.