Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06533436
Clinical and Economic Comparison of 2 Methods of Intubation Tube Fixation : AnchorFastTM Versus Current Cord Fixation
Clinical and Economic Comparison of 2 Methods of Intubation Tube Fixation in the Intensive Care Unit: Benefits of Intubation Tube Fixation with AnchorFastTM Versus Current Cord Fixation
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 250 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Hopital Foch · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the benefits of using the Anchorfast device in reducing complications associated with intubation tube fixation, in terms of the rate of pressure ulcer development, the rate of intubation tube mobilization and the rate of VAP occurrence. If the hypothesis is confirmed, this project would enable the caregivers to optimize the current practice in the interests of both patients and caregivers. That's why the investigators have designed a real-life study, and will also be looking at the effect of care load on and caregiver satisfaction.
Detailed description
In 2022 at Hôpital FOCH, 41% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit required an orotracheal intubation tube (OIT), exposing them to the risk of developing orotracheal intubation tube (OIT), exposing them to the risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Preventing VAP involves oral hygiene and limiting tube movements, which depend on the device used to attach the OIT . The care protocol used routinely in the department uses adhesive tape and a rigid cotton haberdashery cord. This type of fixation impedes buccal access, prevents easy repositioning of the probe and is liable to cause eschar lesions. With the aim of improving the practices, the investigators took a closer look at the French recommendations. The Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (French Intensive Care Society) does not recommend a particular fixation method, but it does relay publications that shows the superiority of the AnchorfastTM device over adhesive tape fixation in terms of the incidence of pressure sores and accidental catheter mobilization. The aim of this study is to assess the benefits of using the Anchorfast device in reducing complications associated with intubation tube fixation, in terms of the rate of pressure ulcer development, the rate of intubation tube mobilization and the rate of VAP occurrence. If the hypothesis is confirmed, this project would enable the caregivers to optimize the current practice in the interests of both patients and caregivers. That's why the investigators have designed a real-life study, and will also be looking at the effect of care load on and caregiver satisfaction.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Corded tube care | The caregiver cut a 6 cm strip of Tensoplast® and wrapped it around the intubation probe at the level of the prescribed fixation mark at the corner of the mouth. The cord strands are placed around the patient's head, tightened, and a double knot is tied at the patient's cheek. Compresses are placed over the ears to protect them from possible lesions caused by the cords. |
| DEVICE | Tube care attached by AnchorFast | Shaving is recommended for patients with beards, and prior family consent is required for patients with beards. AnchorFast is Suitable for intubation probes from 5 to 10 mm in diameter, it adapts to different morphologies thanks to hydrocolloid dressings bonded to the face and an adjustable cord around the neck. Due to its rigidity, this device is not recommended for patients whose condition requires them to be positioned in the ventral decubitus (VD) or lateral decubitus position. |
| OTHER | Caregiver's evaluation on each tube fixation | The caregivers who performs the interventions according to the study will fill question form to assess the worload and the confort of the tube care for each intervention type The caregivers are both a research actor and a study population. One of the secondary aims of this study is to evaluate the two types of tube-fixing with regard to caregiver workload and comfort in performing care. Caregivers will complete identical questionnaires assessing their satisfaction with the two types of tube fixation studied in arms 1 and 2. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-08-02
- Primary completion
- 2026-08-02
- Completion
- 2026-12-02
- First posted
- 2024-08-01
- Last updated
- 2025-02-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06533436. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.