Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT06531915
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Ciprofol and Remimazolam During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Ciprofol and Remimazolam During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: a Study Protocol for a Single-center, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 190 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Anhui Provincial Hospital · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Both ciprofol and remimazolam have been found to be potential alternatives to propofol (a commonly used anesthesia) during fiberoptic bronchoscopy, while the efficacy and safety between ciprofol and remimazolam have not been reported. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety between ciprofol and remimazolam in patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Ciprofol | Participants in the ciprofol group will be intravenously injected with 0.4 mg/kg of ciprofol (batch number H20200013, Haisike Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China) and sufentanil (0.2 μg/kg). |
| DRUG | Remimazolam | Participants in the remimazolam group will be intravenously injected with 0.1 mg/kg of remimazolam besylate (batch number HR7056, Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China) and sufentanil (0.2 μg/kg). |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2024-12-30
- Completion
- 2025-03-31
- First posted
- 2024-08-01
- Last updated
- 2024-08-01
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06531915. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.