Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06525129

Multi-session Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) vs Anodal Cerebral tDCS

Comparison of Multi-session Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Anodal Cerebral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance, Its Components and Postural Stability in Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30 (actual)
Sponsor
Riphah International University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
40 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

To investigate which one of the two cerebellar and cerebral stimulation in comparison to sham stimulation is more effective in enhancing balance and postural stability in stroke patients

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERCerebellar stimulation group (CbSG)Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation was given using a portable battery-driven brain stimulator (The Brain Stimulator v3.0 Deluxe tDCS Kit, using Professional 3x3 inches Amrex Sponge Electrodes). Skin was prepared before application of electrodes by cleaning the skin surface using alcohol swabs. In cerebellar stimulation group (CbSG) a stimulation intensity of 2mA for duration of 20 minutes. In order to avoid sudden initiation and termination of the stimulation the first and last 10 seconds of anodal tDCS application, current will gradually fade in/fade out to avoid any sudden starting or stopping of the stimulation. For the CbSG active anodal electrode was placed over the cerebellum with about 1-2 cm below inion occipital protuberance, whereas the returning cathodal electrode was placed on right buccinator muscle.
OTHERCerebral (M1) Stimulation group (MSG)In the M1 Stimulation Group (MSG) a similar intensity of current with 2mA was applied for a period of 20 minutes. Skin was cleaned with alcohol swab ahead of placing the electrodes. The anode was positioned over the lesioned M1 motor cortex area (C3, International 10-20 system) while the cathode was placed over the contra-lateral supraorbital area. Due to the large size of electrodes, the active electrode covered the area of M1 for the hand, arm, trunk, and the LL. Ten sessions of anodal tDCS were applied over a duration of 2 weeks. The stimulation was applied during active participation of patients in Biodex balance training.
OTHERSham Stimulation group (SSG)In Sham Stimulation group (SSG) Ten sessions of anodal tDCS were applied over a duration of 2 weeks having same intensity i.e., 2 mA stimulation was used for a period of 30 seconds and then gradually ramped-down and turned off for the rest of the treatment time of 20 minutes. The same procedure for skin preparation was used as in the other two groups. Electrode placement for SSG was same as in MSG for half of the patients i.e. 8 participants; anode will be placed over the left (dominant) lesioned M1 whereas the cathode will be positioned over the right (contralateral) supraorbital area. For the other 8 participants the stimulation montages were similar to cerebellar stimulation group. The active anodal electrode was placed over the cerebellum with about 1-2 cm below inion occipital protuberance, whereas the returning cathodal electrode was placed on right Buccinator Muscle.

Timeline

Start date
2024-07-01
Primary completion
2025-02-01
Completion
2025-02-01
First posted
2024-07-29
Last updated
2025-03-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06525129. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.