Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06505798

Cryoballoon/Radiofrequency/Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Versus Medical Treatment for Heart

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,200 (estimated)
Sponsor
University College, London · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that causes an irregular heart beat and is a cause of heart failure (HF). Treatments include drugs to slow the heart rate, anti-arrhythmic drugs or ablation of the heart to help preserve normal rhythm. A number of trials have suggested that ablation may be superior to drug treatment to reduce hospitalisations or prevent early death. However, these studies have been small and the results not applicable to the general population with AF and heart failure in the UK. This international study will compare catheter ablation and optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone to see if catheter ablation reduces unplanned heart failure hospitalisations and death rates and improves quality of life.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the severity of, and death from, heart failure (HF). Several small studies have demonstrated that restoration of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation in patients with HF improves left ventricular (LV) function and exercise tolerance. What is unknown is whether or not AF ablation reduces all-cause death and urgent CV hospitalisations in populations with HF. The current trial will answer this outstanding question, which is faced by HF clinicians and electrophysiologists on a daily basis. AF ablation can be performed very effectively and efficiently using a cryo-balloon or radio-frequency ablation PVI technique. These techniques have evolved slowly and are unlikely to change substantially over the course of this trial. One small trial (n=363) in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT defibrillator recipients (CASTLE-AF) reported a death benefit of AF ablation but the patients were highly selected and the death reduction was far higher than real world expected differences. Recent studies have noted that the population randomised in CASTLE-AF was not representative of the general HF population with only 7% of patients in the "real world" setting meeting the trial entry criteria. CASTLE-AF is therefore provocative but inconclusive; it has made little change to clinical practice. As no studies have investigated the death benefit in a general HF population, the proposed trial is necessary and warranted. This study is designed as a randomised, open label multicentre clinical trial in which catheter ablation and medical therapy is compared to medical therapy alone in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (\<50%) and paroxysmal or persistent AF to determine if this reduces all-cause death and urgent CV hospitalisations as well as improving QoL. By utilising the clinical and research networks of the British Heart Failure Society and British Heart Rhythm Society (BHRS) we will recruit 1200 patients. The current trial will be almost three times the size of the only previous inconclusive trial which was reported in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURECatheter AblationParticipants randomised to the catheter ablation arm will undergo Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) which is the essential ablation intervention. The technique used will be at the discretion of the treating physician but may include Cryoballoon (Medtronic/Boston Scientific), Radiofrequency: CARTO (Biosense), pulsed field radiofrequency ablation, or Precision (Abbott Medical) electro-anatomical mapping systems. Additional ablation lesions may be delivered as preferred by the operator and will be documented. Electro-anatomical voltage maps will be collected (in SR/AF) and stored for later analysis.

Timeline

Start date
2024-11-21
Primary completion
2031-12-15
Completion
2031-12-15
First posted
2024-07-17
Last updated
2025-11-26

Locations

14 sites across 1 country: United Kingdom

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06505798. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.