NCT06496906

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction Systems

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 116 (actual)
• Sponsor: Plovdiv Medical University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the vertical extraction system Benex and Physics forceps with the conventional extraction tools (extraction forceps and elevators) in the early wound healing period after tooth extraction, as means for minimally invasive tooth extraction. All patients aged 18 years and over who require closed tooth extraction with good oral hygiene were eligible for participation. Participants were randomly allocated to tooth extraction with either Benex, Physics forceps or conventional extraction tools using box randomization. Patients are followed up during the recovery period to assess pain and early wound healing, while at the time of extraction, success and buccal cortical plate fracture were evaluated.

Conditions

• Tooth Extraction Status Nos

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Tooth extraction	A regular closed tooth extraction was performed with the different devices from each arm.
DEVICE	Benex	Benex was used to perform the intervention.
DEVICE	Physics Forceps	Physics forceps were used to perform the intervention.
DEVICE	Conventional Extraction Forceps	Conventional Extraction Forceps were used to perform the intervention.

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-09-01
• Primary completion: 2023-01-01
• Completion: 2023-01-01
• First posted: 2024-07-11
• Last updated: 2024-07-11

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Bulgaria