NCT06484517

Is HugeMed Video Laryngoscope Superior to McGrath in Pediatric Patients

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 40 (actual)
• Sponsor: Marmara University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 6 Months – 3 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Videolaryngoscopes improve laryngeal visualization in children under 3 years. In this study we aimed to compare Hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscopes regarding their Cormach-Lehane (CL) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores. Furthermore, tracheal intubation success rates, need for cricoid pressure and optimization maneuvers, and hemodynamic changes are compared.

Conditions

• Difficult Intubation

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Hugemed Videolaryngoscope	After general anesthesia induction, the first group of patients (Group M, n=20) was intubated with the McGrath videolaryngoscope. For the second group (Group H, n=20), the Hugemed videolaryngoscope was used. Patients were intubated using one of the appropriate blades numbered 1, 2, or 3 based on their height, weight, and age.

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-03-01
• Primary completion: 2022-10-01
• Completion: 2023-01-31
• First posted: 2024-07-03
• Last updated: 2025-01-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)