Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT06470152
A Novel Classification of Sagittal Spinal Alignment to Aid Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity
Pelvic Incidence-Dependent Clustering of Sagittal Spinal Alignment: A Novel Classification to Aid Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Surgical outcomes, including radiographic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, postoperative complications, and revision surgery rates, were compared in patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent correction surgery with reference to our pelvic incidence-dependent (PI-dependent) clustering of sagittal spinal alignment and existing standards (sagittal age-adjusted score \[SAAS\], global alignment and proportion \[GAP\] score, and Roussouly classification). Our findings may provide tangible guidance for surgical decision-making in ASD.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Correction strategy in reference to our PI-dependent clustering of sagittal alignment | For type I patients (PI \< 39.56°), the target LL = -0.13\*PI2+9.36\*PI-134.08; for type II patients (39.56° ≤ PI \< 49.16°), the target LL = 0.45\*PI+26.57; for type III patients (49.16° ≤ PI \< 58.31°), the target LL = -0.15\*PI2+17.09\*PI-420.57; for type IV patients (PI \> 58.31°), the target LL = 0.06\*PI2-7.55\*PI+289.77. Prediction intervals of 95% confidence is adopted as the target LL range. |
| PROCEDURE | Correction strategy in reference to the SAAS score | This new score is composed of three sagittal parameters (PI-LL, PT and TPA). For these three parameters, points were assigned based on offset with age-adjusted targets 0 points if the parameter was within 10 years of the patient's age (Match). For each 20 years above the age-adjusted target, 1 point was added (e.g., + 1 point between + 10 and + 30, + 2 points between +30 and +50). Conversely, 1 point was subtracted for each 20 years below the age-adjusted target (e.g., -1 point between -10 and -30, -2 points between -30 and -50). SAAS was calculated by adding all 3 components, creating a discreet score that could have a negative value (under corrected) or positive value (over corrected). SAAS was sub-categorized into "SAAS-Under" if it was less than -1, "SAAS-Match" if it was between -1 and + 1 or "SAAS-Over" if it was greater than + 1. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2027-12-01
- Completion
- 2027-12-01
- First posted
- 2024-06-24
- Last updated
- 2024-06-24
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06470152. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.