Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT06467721
Clinical Efficacy of Self-adhesive Silicone Gel Waterproof Dressings Versus Conventional Dressings in the Healing of Incisions After Total Joint Arthroplasty
Clinical Efficacy of Self-adhesive Silicone Gel Waterproof Dressings Versus Conventional Dressings in the Healing of Incisions After Total Joint Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Study
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 600 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The efficacy of using self-adhesive silicone gel waterproof dressings versus conventional gauze dressings for recovery after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains unclear. In our study, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare these two types of dressings. Patients were divided into two groups following TJA, and we collected primary outcome measures such as skin infection rate and re-operation rate. Additionally, we gathered blood inflammatory indicators, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), to evaluate the effectiveness of the two treatments. Finally, we perform one year follow up including REEDA score, MSS score to evaluate the recovery of the skin.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Self-adhesive silicone gel waterproof dressing | Self-adhesive silicone gel waterproof dressing is used after artificial joint replacement surgery. |
| DEVICE | Sterile gauze dressing | Sterile gauze dressing is used after artificial joint replacement surgery. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
- First posted
- 2024-06-21
- Last updated
- 2024-06-21
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06467721. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.