NCT06430710

Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TAD) Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite

Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite;Oral Hygiene, Pain and Treatment Effect

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 16 (actual)
• Sponsor: Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls · Other Government
• Sex: All
• Age: 15 Years – 22 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite

Detailed description

this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) \[miniscrew\] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.

Conditions

• Deep Overbite

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Intrusion	2 different methods for incisor intrusion

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-09-25
• Primary completion: 2024-02-02
• Completion: 2024-03-27
• First posted: 2024-05-28
• Last updated: 2024-05-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt