NCT06418841

A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Versus Conventional Midline Approach for Lumbar Puncture

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 84 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Fujian Medical University Union Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 99 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group (group A) or the MAT treatment group (group B). Researchers will compare CMPAT treatment group and the MAT treatment group to see if the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP, the puncture success rate, pain assessment in the back, head, and legs, and the occurrence of complications have different.

Conditions

• Spinal Puncture

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique	Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique
PROCEDURE	Conventional Midline Approach Technique	Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-10-28
• Primary completion: 2025-10-28
• Completion: 2025-10-28
• First posted: 2024-05-17
• Last updated: 2024-05-17