Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT06418308
Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine vs Epinephrine
Comparison of Intrathecal Epinephrine Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants in Cesarean Section
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 62 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 55 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Several studies have shown that adding dexmedetomidine or epinephrine to single-dose spinal analgesia preparations improves the length and/or speed of onset of the sensory block and post-operative pain management without increased negative side effects. To date, however, no study has compared adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in single-dose spinal analgesia. The purpose of this study is to determine if adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in providing better single-dose spinal analgesia during cesarean section.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Dexmedetomidine | 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine |
| DRUG | Epinephrine | 200 mcg of epinephrine |
| DRUG | Standardized Spinal Mixture | Standardized spinal mixture of 10.25 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, and 0.125 mg morphine. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-09-17
- Primary completion
- 2026-03-01
- Completion
- 2026-03-01
- First posted
- 2024-05-17
- Last updated
- 2026-01-07
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Regulatory
- FDA-regulated drug study
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06418308. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.