Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06418308

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine vs Epinephrine

Comparison of Intrathecal Epinephrine Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants in Cesarean Section

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62 (estimated)
Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Several studies have shown that adding dexmedetomidine or epinephrine to single-dose spinal analgesia preparations improves the length and/or speed of onset of the sensory block and post-operative pain management without increased negative side effects. To date, however, no study has compared adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in single-dose spinal analgesia. The purpose of this study is to determine if adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in providing better single-dose spinal analgesia during cesarean section.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGDexmedetomidine5 mcg of dexmedetomidine
DRUGEpinephrine200 mcg of epinephrine
DRUGStandardized Spinal MixtureStandardized spinal mixture of 10.25 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, and 0.125 mg morphine.

Timeline

Start date
2024-09-17
Primary completion
2026-03-01
Completion
2026-03-01
First posted
2024-05-17
Last updated
2026-01-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06418308. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.