NCT06417164

Effects of FMS Functional Movement Training on Body Posture Control in College Female Aerobics Athletes

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 40 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Lan Li · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years – 23 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

For this experiment, it was planned to randomly assign 40 female college aerobics athletes to two groups: a traditional physical training group (control group, T, N=20) and a functional training group (experimental group, F, N=20). The control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on the FMS functional movement design. The experimental group was scheduled to undergo a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. Before and after the experiment, the subjects' FMS scores, body posture control, and competition performance will be measured.

Detailed description

Randomized into: Control, Traditional physical training Group, T, N = 20 , Intervention, Functional training Group, F, N = 20). The control group used traditional physical training methods, and the experimental group used FMS-based functional movement training methods. A 12-week functional movement training program was used and the experimental group was given intervention training 4 times a week for 40 min each time, and FMS scores, body posture control, and athletic performance were tested before and after the intervention. It was expected that the main assessment criteria would include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (deep squat, hurdle step, lunge squat, shoulder flexibility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and trunk rotational stability) as well as dynamic and static body postural control in aerobics movements. Tests of T-run and basic pace Y-jump time and athletic performance were used as secondary outcomes. The main tools included: a set of FMS tester, a roll of yellow tape, a measuring tape, a stopwatch, and a test chart for each index. The test was divided into two phases. Phase 1: corrective training (1-4 weeks), Phase 2 is: the overall movement (functional patterning) 5-12 weeks, while the design concept of the program is shown in the increase of difficulty, specialization, but also includes the process of static stability to dynamic stability, and then finally, the overall movement pattern training. Tools used: balance disk, Swiss ball, solid ball, foam shaft, massage stick.

Conditions

• Postural Balance

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
BEHAVIORAL	Functional Movement Training Group	The program control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on FMS functional movement design. The experimental group will receive a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. The experimental group will be divided into two phases, a corrective intervention phase and a capacity enhancement phase, and the main assessment criteria will include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (squat, hurdle step, deep squat, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stabilizing push-ups, and trunk rotational stabilization), as well as the ability to control the body's dynamic and static postures during aerobic exercise.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-05-25
• Primary completion: 2024-08-01
• Completion: 2024-09-01
• First posted: 2024-05-16
• Last updated: 2024-05-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China