Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06416657

General Anesthesia vs Local Anesthesia for Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Using Flow Diverter

General Anesthesia vs Local Anesthesia for Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Using Flow Diverter: an Exploratory Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
188 (estimated)
Sponsor
Ming Lv · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) in the population is about 2%-7%, and once it ruptures and bleeds, the rate of disability and death is extremely high, with 10%-15% of patients dying suddenly before they can seek medical attention, 35% of first-time bleeders, and 60%-80% of second-time bleeders. Survivors are often disabled. Therefore, there is a broad consensus that UIA with surgical indication should be aggressively intervened. The efficacy and safety of flow diverter (FD) in the treatment of UIA has been confirmed by many large clinical trials. Currently, FD placement for UIA is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in most centers, however, some studies have observed that FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) is not as effective as FD placement under general anesthesia and have demonstrated the feasibility of FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) with high technical success rates and low perioperative complication rates and mortality. However, the retrospective design and relatively limited sample size of the above studies may introduce significant bias and affect the confidence of the conclusions. Therefore, the present trial was designed as a randomized controlled trial with the aim of comparing the safety and efficacy of GA and LA in UIA patients undergoing FD placement. The results of this study will help inform future multicenter trials to validate the impact of anesthesia choice on the safety and efficacy in UIA patients undergoing FD placement.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERDifferent anesthesia methods, namely local anesthesia and general anesthesiaPatients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation. Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.

Timeline

Start date
2024-06-01
Primary completion
2025-11-12
Completion
2026-06-01
First posted
2024-05-16
Last updated
2025-12-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06416657. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.