Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06390787

The Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination in Comparison With the Other Antiemetics

Enhancing Antiemetic Efficacy: A Randomized Trial of Vitamin B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Therapy Versus Traditional Regimens

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Baghdad · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study investigates the effectiveness of combining vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to standard antiemetic treatments for managing nausea and vomiting. Through a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving adult patients with diverse causes of nausea and vomiting, we aim to evaluate the frequency, severity, and tolerability of the B6 and metoclopramide combination. By elucidating its comparative efficacy against established antiemetics, this research seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in selecting optimal treatment regimens tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately enhancing the management of nausea and vomiting across various medical conditions.

Detailed description

Title: Investigating the Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Versus Alternative Antiemetics: A Clinical Trial Proposal Introduction: Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms across various medical conditions and can significantly impact patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes. While several antiemetic medications exist, finding the most effective regimen remains a clinical challenge. This proposal aims to investigate the efficacy of a combination therapy comprising vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to other antiemetics in managing nausea and vomiting. Rationale: Both vitamin B6 and metoclopramide have shown antiemetic properties through different mechanisms of action. However, the comparative efficacy of this combination therapy against other standard antiemetics remains largely unexplored. Understanding the relative effectiveness of this combination could provide valuable insights into optimizing antiemetic strategies, particularly in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other related conditions. Objectives: This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy compared to alternative antiemetic regimens in reducing the frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting episodes in adult patients. Additionally, the study seeks to assess the safety profile and tolerability of the combination therapy. Conclusion: By elucidating the comparative efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy, this study endeavors to contribute to evidence-based decision-making in the management of nausea and vomiting. The findings could potentially guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate antiemetic regimen tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGMetoclopramide and Vitamin B6We gave a combination of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.
DRUGVitamin B6We gave only vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.
DRUGOndansetronWe gave only Zofran as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.
DRUGMetoclopramideWe gave only Metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Timeline

Start date
2024-01-30
Primary completion
2024-04-20
Completion
2024-04-21
First posted
2024-04-30
Last updated
2024-04-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Iraq

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06390787. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.