Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06384092

Process Validation in Dermatology: Assessing Methods for UV Exposure (Artificial Source vs. Sunlight) and Efficacy Evaluation of Anti-Tanning Agents

Standardization of UV Exposure Methods (Artificial Source vs. Sunlight) in Dermatological Research: A Comprehensive Investigation Into the Efficacy Assessment Methodology for Anti-tanning Agents Through Process Validation

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6 (actual)
Sponsor
NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The rationale of this study is to establish a robust method for assessing sun protection product efficacy in preventing erythema and tanning. Employing both artificial ultraviolet-A Irradiation and natural direct sunlight exposure, the investigation seeks to provide a reliable methodology, ensuring reproducibility and enabling a direct comparison between these methods. Meticulously determining optimal UV dosages, the study prioritizes inducing skin responses for evaluation while avoiding adverse effects like blistering. The localized validation of UV exposure techniques, tailored to the Indian population, contributes significantly to the field by addressing diverse skin types and environmental conditions. By incorporating both artificial and natural (direct sunlight) UV exposure methods, the study aspires to enhance the safety and effectiveness of future dermatological investigations, benefiting both the scientific community and the broader population.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERTest Sun Protection CreamApply directly on the designated site till absorbed.
OTHERBenchmark Sun Protection CreamApply directly on the designated site till absorbed.

Timeline

Start date
2024-03-07
Primary completion
2024-03-13
Completion
2024-03-13
First posted
2024-04-25
Last updated
2024-04-29

Locations

1 site across 1 country: India

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06384092. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.