NCT06375837

Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites

Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites in Non-carious Cervical Lesions

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 33 (actual)
• Sponsor: Hacettepe University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 65 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The clinical performance of an an alkasite-based restorative material and two different resin composites will be evaluated and compared in non-carious cervical lesions. After recruiting participants with at least three non-carious cervical lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. Lesions will be divided in three groups: an alkasite-based restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein (CN)), hybrid resin composite (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GD)) and a highly filled flowable resin composite ((G-aenial Universal Flo, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GF)). All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using FDI criteria. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.

Conditions

• Tooth Diseases

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	an alkasite-based restorative material	Cention N
DEVICE	hybrid resin composite	Gradia Direct Anterior
DEVICE	a highly filled flowable resin composite	G-aenial Universal Flo

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-04-15
• Primary completion: 2024-06-15
• Completion: 2026-06-15
• First posted: 2024-04-19
• Last updated: 2025-12-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)