Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT06372782
Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lido and Vital Without Lido in Dorsal Hand
A Randomized, Split-Hand, Subject-Blinded Study Comparing Pain, Safety and Effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital Without Lidocaine for Improved Appearance of the Dorsal Hand in Chinese Subjects
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 90 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Galderma R&D · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a randomized, multi-center, split-hand, subject-blinded study comparing pain, safety and effectiveness of Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine and Restylane Vital without lidocaine for improving appearance of the dorsal hands in Chinese subjects.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine | Each subject will receive treatment on Day 1 with Restylane Skinboosters Vital Lidocaine in one hand and Restylane Vital in the opposite hand, as randomly assigned. |
| DEVICE | Restylane Vital | Each subject will receive treatment on Day 1 with Restylane Vital in one hand and the experimental device in the opposite hand, as randomly assigned |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-04-24
- Primary completion
- 2024-06-28
- Completion
- 2024-07-16
- First posted
- 2024-04-18
- Last updated
- 2025-10-10
- Results posted
- 2025-10-10
Locations
3 sites across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06372782. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.