NCT06365723

Effects of Walking in Greenspace and the Built Environment in Adults With Prediabetes: A Randomized Crossover Trial

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 216 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Minnesota · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 25 Years – 64 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this randomized crossover trial is to compare the differences in psychological and physiological effects of walking in two different outdoor environments (urban/suburban commercial environments vs. urban/suburban nature areas/preserves) in adults with prediabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do psychological measures of stress, anxiety, and affect improve more in one type of outdoor environment over the other? * Do physiological measures of stress improve more in one type of outdoor environment over the other? As this is a crossover trial, participants will serve as their own controls. Researchers will compare both the psychological and physiological effects walking in the two types of outdoor environments. Participants will: * Walk 150-minutes per week for six weeks in each of the two outdoor conditions. * Visit the clinic four times, including before and after each six-week walking period. * Collect saliva samples immediately proceeding or following the four clinic visits. * Return to their pre-study level of physical activity for a 5-week washout period between each of the two walking interventions.

Detailed description

Approximately 92 million U.S. adults (\~38% of population) have prediabetes (PreD). Because people with PreD are at high risk CMD, they are a target population for diabetes prevention programs. The focus is people with PreD because of their high risk for developing CMD and large numbers, providing an opportunity to investigate behavioral and environmental approaches as preventive measures in a well-defined population. Urbanization affords challenges and opportunities to public health that include exposure to obesogenic environments, air pollution, and psychosocial stressors. In healthy adults suggest exposure to nature has health benefits relative to exposure to built environments. Hypothesized mechanisms for health benefits of Greenspace exposure include increased physical activity (PA), attention restoration, stress reduction, and reduced exposure to pollution. Many of the health benefits are associated with reduced psychological and physiological stress leading to better autonomic functioning as assessed by heart rate variability (HRV) and other biomarkers. Multiple studies suggest that PA and exposure to natural environments may act together to improve health. Yet, aside from our preliminary studies, we are not aware of any studies that examined how physical activity may interact with exposure to urban Greenspace ('Green') compared with built urban environments ('Gray'), to reduce stress and improve health. The purpose of this proposed study is to conduct a randomized crossover trial comparing differences in the psychosocial and physiological effects of walking in urban Green and Gray spaces in adults with PreD.

Conditions

• PreDiabetes
• Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
• Stress and Anxiety
• Stress Biomarkers

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
BEHAVIORAL	Nature-based Walking	All participants will be asked to walk three to five times per week for 30-50 minutes per walk, totaling 150 min/week, at moderate intensity over a 6-week period in a designated nature-based, or 'green', urban environment.
BEHAVIORAL	Built-environment/Commercial Walking	All participants will be asked to walk three to five times per week for 30-50 minutes per walk, totaling 150 min/week, at moderate intensity over a 6-week period in a designated built-environment/commercial, or 'Gray', urban environment.

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-06-06
• Primary completion: 2027-11-30
• Completion: 2027-11-30
• First posted: 2024-04-15
• Last updated: 2025-09-22

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: United States